Golden Gate Legal Review Independent Commentary on Law & Policy

Golden Gate Legal Review publishes commentary and analysis on the constitutional and statutory questions moving through the federal courts and the California legislature — privacy and the Fourth Amendment, housing, criminal justice, immigration, labor, and the law of emerging technology. The Review offers analysis, not legal advice.


First Amendment

Supreme Court Reshapes Campaign Finance Landscape

The Supreme Court’s ruling in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Comm'n redefines the boundaries of campaign finance regulation under the First Amendment.


Contributing Editor · Constitutional Law

Read the analysis


Recent
Commentary

01 Chatrie v. United States, No. 25-112, 609 U.S. ___ (2026); United States v. Chatrie, 136 F.4th 100 (4th Cir. 2025) (en banc), vacated; Carpenter v. United States, 585 U.S. 296 (2018).

Chatrie and the Geofence Warrant the Supreme Court Just Judged

Chatrie v. United States, No. 25-112, was argued April 27, 2026 and is still undecided. Inside the geofence-warrant fight over the Fourth Amendment.

Diane M. Calloway Jun 2026
02 AB 1157, 2025-26 Reg. Sess. (Cal.) (failed passage Jan. 13, 2026; died Jan. 31, 2026); Cal. Civ. Code section 1947.12.

AB 1157 Stalls: California’s Rent Cap Holds for 2026

AB 1157 would have cut California's rent cap to 2% plus CPI, but it died in committee in January 2026. The existing 5%-plus-CPI cap under Civ. Code 1947.12 stands.

Marcus Reyes Jun 2026
03 A.C.A. 6, 2025–2026 Reg. Sess. (Cal. 2025); Cal. Const. art. I, § 6; A.B. 247, 2025–2026 Reg. Sess. (Cal. 2025), amending Cal. Penal Code § 4019.2

ACA 6 Returns Forced-Prison-Labor Question to the 2026 Ballot

California's ACA 6 would delete the constitution's punishment exception after Prop 6 failed in 2024, as AB 247 raises incarcerated-firefighter wages to $7.25.

Priya Anand Jun 2026
04 Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967); Carpenter v. United States, 585 U.S. 296 (2018).

The Third-Party Doctrine Meets the Cloud

The third-party doctrine once seemed tidy: share information with a bank or a phone company, and you forfeit any expectation of privacy in it. Cloud computing has made that premise hard to sustain.

Diane M. Calloway May 2026
Active Monitoring

The Tracker

Docket & Legislative Watch
Case / Bill Reference Subject Status Last Action
Chatrie v. United States (No. 25-112)U.S. Supreme Court · Argued Apr 27, 2026PrivacyDECIDED06.29.26
Cal. AB 1157 (Affordable Rent Act)Cal. Assembly · Judiciary CmteHousingFAILED — DIED IN COMMITTEE01.31.26
Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (H.R. 4639)U.S. Congress · H.R. 4639 (118th)PrivacyPASSED HOUSE 2024 · REINTRODUCED 202604.17.24

View the full tracker →